Free scan · Your own files · No signup

Your org changed.Your payroll
probably didn't.

Drop in your HR file and your payroll file. Get back a list of every person the two systems disagree about.

Terminations still on payroll. Transfers running in two countries. Promotions that never reached commissions. Ninety seconds, in your browser.

See your drift first. Pay only if it’s worth it.

Findings, severity and dollars are free$10 opens the detailNo subscriptionYour files never leave the tab

Built for the payroll and sales-comp analysts who catch this by hand today. No session recording on any page that touches your data.

$40,000one overpayment, one employee

Reported to us by a payroll lead running ADP, UKG and Workday. Exactly the kind of miss a cross-system check exists to catch.

Beta member · reported, not caught by us

30 hrsa month, reconciling by hand

What the same person spends checking those systems against each other. The work this replaces is already on somebody’s calendar.

Beta member · Payroll lead

98%less time on the same check

The reconciliation tool our founder built inside a Fortune 500 comp team, years before OrgDrift existed.

Ken Lannon · Founder

Companies withheld. Roles, stacks and figures are as reported by the people who ran the work. We label what we found ourselves and what we did not.

Walk through a full report

Seen enough? The scan takes ninety seconds.

Your own files, in your own browser. Findings, severity and dollars are free. $10 opens the detail.

Why this product exists
“I was the one signing the control.
I knew what was missing.”

I spent two decades inside the comp and payroll systems every enterprise runs on, and I watched the same failure over and over. Something changes in one system. It syncs to most of the others. A few never catch up. By the time anyone notices, the wrong dollar has been paid, in the wrong country, against a status that no longer exists.

I served as reviewer on eleven commission controls in a Fortune 500 risk and control matrix. The evidence we attached was a PDF of a spreadsheet of a query. No auditor was ever really comfortable with that, including me.

So I built my own reconciliation tool inside that comp team, and it cut one recurring check by 98%. That proved the checking could be automated. It could not prove the check ran, because I built it, I ran it, and an auditor discounts anything you attest to yourself.

OrgDrift is the independent version I always wanted to cite. Now I'm building it.

Ken Lannon
Founder, OrgDrift
KL
Ken Lannon
Founder · OrgDrift
20+ years enterprise sales compensation & RevOps leadership
Palo Alto Networks · CyberArk · VMware · EMC · Philips
Certified Sales Compensation Professional (CSCP)
Reviewer on 11 SOX commission controls
Built a comp reconciliation tool that cut one recurring check by 98%
Practitioner, not vendor · U.S. Navy veteran
Advisory circle
Practicing SOX directors, payroll managers, and sales comp analysts at Fortune 500 companies. Roster shared under NDA on request.
Works with the systems you already run
People & Benefits
WorkdayADPBambooHRFidelitySequoiaAlightPrincipal
Sales & RevOps
SalesforceHubSpotClariCaptivateIQXactlyVaricent
Finance & Payroll
Workday PayrollNetSuiteSuccessFactors
One name

Your team may call it a failed sync, stale record, reconciliation break, or source-of-truth issue.

We call it drift.

If you’ve ever closed a termination only to watch the benefits deduction keep firing, written a clawback memo, signed a restated quarter, or had your name on a control that “passed” before the auditor pulled samples — you know the pattern.

Field validation

A payroll manager walked us through exactly how drift gets past her.

CD
Caroline D.
Payroll Manager
5,000+ employee cybersecurity company
Product validation · March 2026

Caroline's team reconciles employee records every payroll cycle, across HR, ADP, and benefits. That is over 20 manual touchpoints a month. Pull the headcount report. Compare it to ADP, field by field. Flag what doesn't match. By hand, every time.

It trickles down to somebody getting termed off their benefits by mistake.

In a product validation session, Caroline mapped what one wrong record does on its way downstream. This isn't hypothetical. It is the failure she works to prevent every payroll run.

wrong locationwrong tax withholding
wrong statuswrong benefits enrollment
wrong cost centerwrong GL posting
Everything lives in NetSuite — you have to carry it through from your HRIS to payroll, to commissions, to expenses, to your Fidelity feeds. When something's off at the source, it propagates all the way down until someone loses their benefits.
On seeing OrgDrift for the first time
I never would have thought to look for something like this — but once you see it, you realize how many places it applies.It solves problems I didn't even know I had a way to solve.
The root cause

Every control is watching its own domain.

No one is watching the seams.

HR checks HR. Payroll checks payroll. Commissions checks commissions. Finance checks finance. Every domain passes its own check. The drift hides in the spaces between them, where no single reviewer has the complete picture.

Three checks. Every critical change. Every system.

01
Detect

See every critical change, across every system you run.

One read-only layer watches HR, CRM, commissions, payroll, and benefits at once. The moment a pay rate, role, location, plan, status, or enrollment changes in one place, you see whether it reached everywhere else it should have. You set the rules and the time window. The same inputs always produce the same finding, and every run traces back to source.

fixed rulesalways onread-onlyno pipeline changes
02
Verify

Confirm it arrived. Or catch the drift before payroll runs.

When the far system matches what HR intended, the check logs clean. When it does not, you see the exact field that differs, how many people and dollars it touches, and what the whole group adds up to. All before payroll runs. One number, the integrity score, tells you what share of everything checked still agrees across systems. Sorted by severity and sent to you, not buried in another inbox.

integrity score (ODIS)who else is affecteddollars at risk
03
Record

Produce audit-ready evidence. Signed, sealed, linked.

Every check you run leaves a record, whether it passed or failed. We call it a Control Execution Record. Each one is stamped with the time, linked back to your source data, and locked to the record before it, so no one can quietly edit history. Your auditor can accept it as independent evidence and map it straight to the SOX controls you already have.

locked to the prior recordtamper-evidentworkpaper export
If you also have to prove it ran

Continuous Controls Verification. The layer that closes the loop.

DevOps gave software a layer that never stops checking. RevOps gave sales one. Continuous Controls Verification does it for your controls. It watches every system, checks every change, and leaves audit-grade evidence behind as a byproduct. OrgDrift is the first product built for it.

Already running Continuous Controls Monitoring? This is the seam it cannot see. Monitoring watches inside one system. Verification compares two, from outside, and proves they agreed.

Your existing stack has pieces of this. Integration platforms move the data. Reconciliation tools compare the numbers. GRC files the paperwork. Your auditors sample it once a year. None of them close the loop.

Who runs the verification

Different roles. Same source of truth about the truth.

Primary practitioner · Sales Ops

RevOps & Sales Comp Managers

You're the last gate before commission accruals lock, and the first person called when a clawback hits a rep. Run the check across HR, CRM, and the comp engine continuously, so plan assignments, deal ownership, and quota mismatches surface before they turn into rep disputes or month-end rework. Sign a workpaper your auditor can re-verify from source.

Typical concern
"Will the rep accept the clawback?"
Primary practitioner · People Ops

People Ops & HR Analytics

Every HR change ripples out to payroll, benefits, commissions, and access. Catch the ones that never arrived. The termination that didn't off-board. The transfer that never updated the tax state. The status change the benefits feed missed. Catch them before someone loses their coverage.

Primary practitioner · Finance Ops

AR & Finance Ops

Your CRM and your ERP are both right, and they still disagree. Closed-Won deals with no invoice. Invoices with no matching deal. Amounts that moved after the fact. Run the comparison yourself, without touching finance's systems, before the auditor does.

Typical concern
"Is every Closed-Won billed?"
The signer above you

SOX & Internal Audit Directors

When the practitioner hands them a signed Control Execution Record, already mapped to the risk and control matrix they test against, they sample it, re-verify it from source, and close faster. The list of drift auditors need for fraud-risk testing is the same list the practitioner already produced. Finally, a workpaper attachment that isn't a PDF of a spreadsheet of a query.

Typical concern
"Will my auditor accept this as fraud-risk evidence?"
40 seats · 7 taken · every applicant personally reviewed

Studio Unlimited, free for 3 months. $1,500 value. Given to 40 beta operators. Not sold.

See if you qualify

Common questions.

What is OrgDrift?+

OrgDrift checks whether your systems agree about your people.

You upload one export from your HR system and one from payroll, commissions, or benefits. OrgDrift reads them side by side and lists every person the two systems describe differently. A termination payroll never got. A raise commissions never saw. A transfer that left someone on two payrolls. It runs in your browser, and your files never leave your computer.

When you need to prove the check ran, each one seals into a Control Execution Record. It is timestamped, tamper-evident, and your auditor can re-verify it from your own source data.

What is cross-system drift?+

Drift is when one change lands in one system and not in the others. Someone is terminated, promoted, moved to a new territory, or put on a new plan. HR records it correctly. Payroll, commissions, or benefits never catch up.

The integration usually looks fine. The pipe ran. The far end rejected the change, remapped it, or quietly ignored it. And because every reconciliation looks inside one system, nobody sees it until it shows up as a payroll error, a commission dispute, or an audit finding.

Is this the same as Continuous Controls Monitoring (CCM)?+

Close, and the difference matters. Continuous Controls Monitoring grew up around the ERP. Tools like Pathlock and SafePaaS watch transactions and access inside a financial system and flag what breaks a rule. That is real work, and we do not replace it.

Verification asks a different question. Do two systems still agree about the same person and the same dollar? A tool sitting inside your ERP cannot answer that, because it only sees one side. OrgDrift reads both, from outside, and seals what it found as evidence.

If you already run CCM, OrgDrift covers the seam it cannot see. HR to payroll. CRM to commissions. One country payroll to another.

What is Continuous Controls Verification (CCV)?+

Most teams check each system on its own. HR checks HR. Payroll checks payroll. Nobody checks whether the two agree.

Continuous Controls Verification is the habit of running that cross-system check all the time, not once a quarter, and keeping proof that you ran it. It is what DevOps did for software and RevOps did for sales, applied to the checks your auditor asks about. OrgDrift is the first product built for it.

What does the free scan actually show me?+

Findings, severity, and dollar exposure, on your own files, before you pay anything. You see how many people your systems disagree about, how bad each mismatch is, and what it adds up to.

The $10 opens the row-level detail and the exports. If your scan comes back clean, there is nothing to buy and you have paid nothing. See your drift first. Pay only if it is worth it.

What does OrgDrift do with our data?+

Today the scan runs entirely inside your browser tab. There is no upload endpoint to send your file to. Field values are hashed for comparison, and raw employee data never reaches us. We keep the verification evidence and its signatures, nothing else.

Session replay and web analytics are blocked on every route that can render your data, and you can check that by viewing source. Private Mode goes one step further and turns off the last outbound call, so you can disconnect your network and watch a scan finish anyway. Live read-only integrations are on the roadmap.

Who uses OrgDrift?+

Four kinds of people, for four reasons. Payroll and controllership teams check that terminations and rate changes reached payroll. RevOps and sales-comp managers catch plan, territory, and ownership mismatches before a clawback hits a rep. SOX and internal audit directors need evidence they did not produce themselves. CFOs and controllers would rather know now than at quarter close.

We already reconcile manually every month and quarter. Why do we need OrgDrift?+

Manual reconciliation is good work. It is just not complete. Your checks run on a cadence, inside one domain, and often inside one country. Drift that crosses those lines slips past all of them, because no reviewer holds every system view at once.

OrgDrift runs continuously, across domains and across countries. It does not replace your team's judgment. It hands them the one view they currently assemble by hand.

And even when reconciliation works, it produces a findings list, not evidence. At audit time your team still pulls 45 samples and builds workpapers. OrgDrift turns the same work into evidence as a byproduct, so your auditor pulls the samples themselves.

Doesn't our existing iPaaS (Workato, MuleSoft, Boomi) already handle this?+

An integration platform moves data. OrgDrift verifies it arrived correctly. The failure mode is not that the pipe broke. It is that the pipe ran fine, the far system rejected or remapped the change, and nobody was watching for that. OrgDrift is the independent observer above the pipes.

We already have Optro, Workiva, or Diligent. Isn’t that this?+

GRC platforms manage the framework around controls: the documentation, the workflow, the sign-off. They do not read from your operational systems, and they do not produce independent proof that two systems agreed. OrgDrift sits underneath and feeds Control Execution Records into your GRC platform. They are complementary, not competitive.

How is this different from SafeBooks or other reconciliation AI tools?+

Independence. A tool that lives inside your finance stack, or one whose AI decides what looks wrong, is checking its own work, and an auditor will treat its output that way. OrgDrift is a referee: read-only, outside every system it checks, running fixed rules. The same inputs always produce the same finding, and any auditor can re-verify a result from source. The evidence is the product, not a dashboard summary of it.

Couldn't our IT team just build this?+

They could build the checks. Many teams have. What IT cannot build is independence. A control built and run by the same organization that operates the systems is self-attestation, and auditors discount it. OrgDrift's value is not the comparison logic. It is the independent, tamper-evident Control Execution Record proving the check ran, on what data, with what result. Your auditor can sample it without having to trust your scripts.

Is OrgDrift an AI product? What does VERA actually do?+

Pasting an HR export into a chat assistant gives you an opinion that changes between runs, cannot be signed, and will not survive auditor review. Detection has to be repeatable to count as evidence.

OrgDrift's detection engine runs fixed rules. When a change in one system should have reached another and did not, we surface it. No probability, no guessing. That part is auditable.

VERA is the AI layer on top. It speeds up the work around a finding: naming the root cause, sizing the exposure, drafting the remediation messages and tickets, drafting the Control Execution Record. VERA never publishes evidence on its own. Every record needs a human signature first, and VERA's drafts and inputs are logged too, so your auditor can see exactly what was AI-assisted and what was human-reviewed. This follows the NIST AI Risk Management Framework and ISO/IEC 42001 principles.

Why does OrgDrift matter more as we adopt AI and automation?+

AI and automation speed up the work inside your systems. They also speed up the rate at which those systems drift apart. Schemas change, vendors rename fields, models retrain on slightly different data, and an automation that ran cleanly last quarter starts producing the wrong output. Nobody notices until a payroll run, a commission cycle, or an audit surfaces it.

OrgDrift sits above the automation and checks its work against the systems of record. Continuously, on fixed rules, with signed evidence. The automation keeps its speed. The outcomes stay correct.

Will auditors accept a Control Execution Record as evidence?+

Control Execution Records are built to be cited as independent evidence attached to management's assertion in ICFR testing, the annual review of your financial-reporting controls. A Big 4 workpaper template, so records drop into existing audit procedures without re-documentation, is on the roadmap. The goal is simple: let external auditors pull samples directly instead of waiting on workpapers, which turns weeks into hours.

How long from first visit to first real drift finding?+

The scan on the homepage runs on your own files in about ninety seconds. There is no signup and no integration. A full pass across one pair of systems is under a day end to end. Your first Control Execution Record lands inside the first week.

Who is OrgDrift not for?+

If you run one system of record, with no cross-system payroll, comp, benefits, or CRM flows, you do not need a referee yet. That single system's own controls are enough. OrgDrift earns its keep the moment two systems are supposed to agree about the same person or the same dollar and no single reviewer sees both.

We’re mid-M&A integration. Is it too early for us?+

Mid-integration is exactly when drift is most likely and most expensive. OrgDrift is useful the moment two systems are supposed to agree with each other, which is usually day one.

No session recording where your data renders·Read-only access·Field-level hashing·SOC 2 Type I in progress
Find drift now

Is your pay data clean?
Find out now.

Ninety seconds. Your browser only. No integrations, no sales call, no account required.

Runs on your own files, inside your browser. No integrations, no IT ticket, nothing uploaded.

Or have Ken walk your first scan with you

Self-serve stays open to everyone · no sales call · Ken replies within one business day